Thinking Evaluatively in Peacebuilding Design Implementation and Monitoring

November 2016 | Anita Ernstorfer, Isabella Jean, and Peter Woodrow, with Diana Chigas

Suggested Citation:  Ernstorfer, Anita, Isabella Jean, and Peter Woodrow, with Diana Chigas. Thinking Evaluatively in Peacebuilding Design, Implementation and Monitoring: Three Reflecting on Peace Practice (RPP) and Do No Harm (DNH)-infused options to strengthen the effectiveness of peacebuilding strategies and programs. Peacebuilding Evaluation Consortium, 2016.

This resource has been developed by CDA Collaborative Learning Projects in partnership with the Peacebuilding Evaluation Consortium (PEC) and with funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Particular thanks go to Cynthia Clapp Wincek (Alliance for Peacebuilding), Leslie Wingender (Mercy Corps), Mark M. Rogers (independent consultant), and Kiely Barnard-Webster (CDA Collaborative Learning Projects) for their review, and helpful suggestions.

The Peacebuilding Evaluation Consortium

The Peacebuilding Evaluation Consortium (PEC) is a project of Alliance for Peacebuilding (AfP) in partnership with CDA Collaborative Learning Projects, Mercy Corps and Search for Common Ground (SFCG). The project is funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY) and is field-wide effort to address the unique challenges to measuring and learning from peacebuilding programs.

The PEC convenes donors, scholars, policymakers, local and international practitioners, and evaluation experts in an unprecedented open dialogue, exchange, and joint learning. It seeks to address the root causes of weak evaluation practices and disincentives for better learning by fostering field-wide change through three strategic and reinforcing initiatives:

  1. Developing Methodological Rigor;
  2. Improving the Culture of Evaluation and Shared Learning; and
  3. Fostering the Use of Evidence to Inform Peacebuilding Policy.